| For Release:
                January 18, 2002 Eli Lilly Settles FTC
                Charges Concerning Security Breach Company Disclosed E-mail Addresses of 669
                Subscribers to its Prozac Reminder Service Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly) has 
                agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges regarding the 
                unauthorized disclosure of sensitive personal information 
                collected from consumers through its Prozac.com Web site. As 
                part of the settlement, Lilly will take appropriate security 
                measures to protect consumers' privacy.  "Even the unintentional release 
                of sensitive medical information is a serious breach of 
                consumers' trust," said J. Howard Beales, III, Director of the 
                FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection. "Companies that obtain 
                sensitive information in exchange for a promise to keep it 
                confidential must take appropriate steps to ensure the security 
                of that information." Lilly, a pharmaceutical company 
                based in Indiana, manufactures, markets, and sells several 
                drugs, including the anti-depressant medication Prozac. Lilly 
                operates the Prozac.com Web site, which the company promotes as 
                "Your Guide to Evaluating and Recovering from Depression." 
                Several of Lilly's Web sites, including
                
                www.prozac.com and
                
                www.lilly.com, collect personal information from visitors. 
                From March 15, 2000 until June 22, 2001, Lilly offered to 
                consumers the "Medi-messenger" e-mail reminder service. 
                Consumers who used Medi-messenger could design and receive 
                personal e-mail messages to remind them to take or refill their 
                medication. Once a consumer registered for Medi-messenger, the 
                reminder messages were automatically e-mailed from Lilly to the 
                subscriber at the e-mail address she or he had provided, and 
                according to the subscriber's requested schedule.
                These reminders were individualized e-mails and did not 
                identify any other subscribers to the service.  On June 27, 2001, a Lilly 
                employee created a new computer program to access Medi-messenger 
                subscribers' e-mail addresses and sent them an e-mail message 
                announcing the termination of the Medi-messenger service. The 
                June 27th e-mail message included all of the 
                recipients' e-mail addresses within the "To:" line of the 
                message, thereby unintentionally disclosing to each individual 
                subscriber the e-mail addresses of all 669 Medi-messenger 
                subscribers. According to the FTC's complaint, 
                Lilly claimed that it employs measures and takes steps 
                appropriate under the circumstances to maintain and protect the 
                privacy and confidentiality of personal information obtained 
                from or about consumers through its Prozac.com and Lilly.com Web 
                sites. For example, Lilly's privacy policies included statements 
                such as, "Eli Lilly and Company respects the privacy of visitors 
                to its Web sites, and we feel it is important to maintain our 
                guests' privacy as they take advantage of this resource." The FTC complaint alleges that 
                Lilly's claim of privacy and confidentiality was deceptive 
                because Lilly failed to maintain or implement internal measures 
                appropriate under the circumstances to protect sensitive 
                consumer information, which led to the company's unintentional 
                June 27th disclosure of Medi-messenger subscribers' 
                personal information (i.e., e-mail addresses). In fact, 
                according to the complaint, Lilly failed to: provide appropriate 
                training for its employees regarding consumer privacy and 
                information security; provide appropriate oversight and 
                assistance for the employee who sent out the e-mail, who had no 
                prior experience in creating, testing, or implementing the 
                computer program used; and implement appropriate checks and 
                controls on the process, such as reviewing the computer program 
                with experienced personnel and pretesting the program internally 
                before sending out the e-mail. Lilly's failure to implement 
                appropriate measures also violated a number of its own written 
                security procedures. The proposed settlement would bar 
                misrepresentations about the extent to which Lilly maintains and 
                protects the privacy or confidentiality of any personal 
                information collected from or about consumers. Additionally, 
                Lilly would be required to establish and maintain a four-stage 
                information security program designed to establish and maintain 
                reasonable and appropriate administrative, technical, and 
                physical safeguards to protect consumers' personal information 
                against any reasonably anticipated threats or hazards to its 
                security, confidentiality, or integrity, and to protect such 
                information against unauthorized access, use, or disclosure. 
                Specifically, Lilly would be required to: 
                  designate appropriate 
                  personnel to coordinate and oversee the program;identify reasonably 
                  foreseeable internal and external risks to the security, 
                  confidentiality, and integrity of personal information, 
                  including any such risks posed by lack of training, and to 
                  address these risks in each relevant area of its operations, 
                  whether performed by employees or agents, including: (i) 
                  management and training of personnel; (ii) information systems 
                  for the processing, storage, transmission, or disposal of 
                  personal information; and (iii) prevention and response to 
                  attacks, intrusions, unauthorized access, or other information 
                  systems failures;conduct an annual written 
                  review by qualified persons, within ninety (90) days after the 
                  date of service of the order and yearly thereafter, which 
                  shall monitor and document compliance with the program, 
                  evaluate the program's effectiveness, and recommend changes to 
                  it; andadjust the program in light of 
                  any findings and recommendations resulting from reviews or 
                  ongoing monitoring, and in light of any material changes to 
                  Lilly's operations that affect the program. Lilly's security breach was the 
                subject of a July 2001 petition from the American Civil 
                Liberties Union requesting that the FTC investigate and take 
                appropriate action to remedy the breach. The Commission vote to accept the 
                proposed settlement was 5-0. An announcement regarding the 
                proposed consent agreement will be published in the Federal 
                Register shortly. The agreement will be subject to public 
                comment for 30 days, after which the Commission will decide 
                whether to make it final. Comments should be addressed to the 
                FTC, Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., 
                Washington, D.C. 20580. In a concurring statement, 
                Commissioner Orson Swindle stated that he was pleased with the 
                consent agreement that the Commission has reached with Eli Lilly 
                and Company. He said that "Lilly's unfortunate and unintended 
                disclosure of prescription drug users' personal information has 
                given us all the opportunity to evaluate how to improve upon 
                security practices for confidential information. Lilly should be 
                respected for its long-standing efforts in development of its 
                privacy practices, its acceptance of responsibility for the 
                internal failures that resulted in the alleged violation of its 
                privacy policy, and its willingness to take appropriate steps to 
                correct those mistakes." Commissioner Swindle stated that he 
                appreciates the company's leadership in cooperating with the FTC 
                to improve its security measures, and he believes the firm will 
                carry out fully its commitments under the proposed order. 
                "Lilly's responsiveness," he stated, "and its efforts to improve 
                corporate privacy practices can be a model for others to 
                follow." |